Bone Evidence?

So what if we actually have Bone and Skull evidence of Bigfoot and we just miss Identified it?

Wouldn't the DNA come up as "unknown primate" rather than a deformed or resulting from a birth defect ?

Wouldn't the DNA come up as "unknown primate" rather than a deformed or resulting from a birth defect ?

That is the assumtion of it being a Unkown Primate.
I do not Believe Sasquatch is a Primate...like gorilla i see it more a Hominid.

CMcMillan wrote:That is the assumtion of it being a Unkown Primate.
I do not Believe Sasquatch is a Primate...like gorilla i see it more a Hominid.

Wouldn't every hominid also be a primate? I think I understand that you mean a more human ancestry than the grat apes..and I tend to agree...I was just curious as to your distinction.

Great pics!
Myles

Well would it be A genetic Defect, If go with the idea we are evolved from "sasquatch/Hominid" then the genetics that they have is inside of us and could be resesive.
So yes we would see these people of Giantism with Genetic Defect.
I don't know if these skulls have been tested genetically. I haven't looked it up as of yet. But when you look at the skull it does have the cone shape that Sasquatch has.

.

Those skulls belong more on the UFO thread lol.

But I remember those. They came from Peru right? (Or somewhere in South America) Those Indians purposely deformed their skulls from childberth to resemble thier Gods. I remember seeing this on the Star-Child documentary.

I do however think all the creatures we give the title of Bigfoot to are the same Hominids we have on record though