Can anyone translate this?

Probably another rumor, but supposedly the Ketchum DNA study has been peer reviewed and this information was leaked in European circles close to the review boards themselves.

Do we have anyone who speaks German who could translate this..?

http://hominidaepanpongid.american-...artyler-results

Link's broken.

I think this is the link:
http://hominidaepanpongid.american-forum.net/f1-the-ketchum-study-and-bartyler-results
And the review it links to:
https://i.servimg.com/u/f16/18/07/27/90/phoht_12.jpg

Some of the text is the scientific names for various primates:

Nomascus leucogenys = Northern white-cheeked gibbon
Saimiri boliviensis = Black-headed Squirrel Monkey, Bolivian/peruvian Squirrel Monkey, Bolivian Squirrel Monkey
Papio anubis = Olive baboon
Otolemur = Greater galagos
Callitrichidae = marmosets & tamarins

By reverse searching the names in the sidebar I found this article from Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 28, No. 10. (04 May 2011)
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/05/04/molbev.msr121.full.pdf

MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood,
Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods
Koichiro Tamura1,2, Daniel Peterson2, Nicholas Peterson2,
Glen Stecher2, Masatoshi Nei3 and Sudhir Kumar2,4*

The tables and graphs in the main body of the image don't seem to be connected to that paper. I ran the text in the sidebar through Babelfish and got this:

Note to the scientists: new phylogenetic analysis on information and theorems of about GS and his "team" be provided. Algorythmic paths that brought us GS valid results. Continuation analysis for the future must be given this information of further source reference belong, and not be limited:
Koichiro Tamur, Daniel Peterson, Nicholas Peterson, Glen Stecher, Masatoshi Nei and Sudhir Kumar (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood,
Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods, Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731-2739.

The MBE journal is published by Oxford University Press.


Edit: I just noticed that this was posted on the BFRO forum by someone who has just registered and only made two posts and the other forum they allegedly found this on has just been created, only has one member and one post. That's pretty suspicious.
I suspect that the 'leak' is just a bunch of random stuff grabbed from old papers and thrown together with the words 'Bigfoot' and 'Sasquatch' sprinkled in there.

Thanks for the research. Great job! The misinformation circus continues around this supposed study. Hard to tell where all this BS comes from.

This stuff is hard. SOmetimes I think their is a bunch of psychologists all sitting around and seeing how
far they can push hoaxes on Americans. Finding Bigfoot is like Mr Twiggles of teletubbies for cryptid researchers
Those guys cant even work a camera and its just getting to be a joke.