Another Finding Bigfoot Episode Falls flat on its face

Geesh, I thought this was going to be some special episode with DNA results and like
every OTHER episode, NADA, NOTHING.
SERIOUSLY I dont know why I watch anymore. Its almost like watching OUTSIDE AMISH to get Gambling hints
in Vegas

I can't believe that they think DNA evidence can be gotten in one week. The las I heard, DNA takes up to 6 weeks to just get the basic sample run, and that's just for the mitochondrial DNA. And to run and compare can take months. Though I would like to hear his results, in a month or so, of course.

Otherwise, not much to this show tonight. But next eek looks like fun.

Green, next week ALWAYS looks like its going to be good and then it pretty much SUCKS, but what does that say about ME that I still watch? Lol

I quit watching shortly after the first season started. Besides, why watch when I can get a good review every Monday from you good people. If ever there is something interesting, I can always watch the rerun.

It was on Owl-cant you see?

I'm tellin ya Paul, Les Stroud is going to make them look stupid. Mark my words, he will get great evidence.

waste of time....didn't bother with the second episode...

first one was good...second, third were horrible

It like a train wreck, I just can't help myself. Gotta watch. Lol

Other than searching the web and the occasional current sighting, there really isn't anything else relating to BF on tv that is somewhat current.
I DVR each episode and then watch the following day. I usually do a lot of rewinding to see if I can catch anything out of the norm. I also like to watch witness testimony several times to look for some tell tale signs of deception.
I agree the show has a lot to be desired, but what else am I going to watch related to the big guy?

It looked like a pretty small wooded area they went to. Im not sure how once again bigfoot managed to stay just out of range of their thermal camera! Did the bigfoot that was spotted 2 days earlier to get up and stroll accross the open fields and go elsewhere?

BurdenOfProof wrote:It looked like a pretty small wooded area they went to. Im not sure how once again bigfoot managed to stay just out of range of their thermal camera! Did the bigfoot that was spotted 2 days earlier to get up and stroll accross the open fields and go elsewhere?

Good point... There was whatever was in the tree, but that could have been a vulture. But these guys aren't going to find anything anyway. Aside from them, there is a whole crew following them around. I am amazed that they actually caught a deer on the I.R.

Tzieth wrote:

BurdenOfProof wrote:It looked like a pretty small wooded area they went to. Im not sure how once again bigfoot managed to stay just out of range of their thermal camera! Did the bigfoot that was spotted 2 days earlier to get up and stroll accross the open fields and go elsewhere?

Good point... There was whatever was in the tree, but that could have been a vulture. But these guys aren't going to find anything anyway. Aside from them, there is a whole crew following them around. I am amazed that they actually caught a deer on the I.R.

Yea its crazy. They go to the trouble of getting in boats to "sneak up" on bigfoot quietly. Then they start howling and screaming? Erm what?

I am interested in what Les Stroud has to say. I never put the FAKER label on Todd Standing.
I have talked to Todd many times and I have never seen anything that makes me think he would
fake this stuff. Especially after *NOT* FINDING BIG FOOT said Todd was a hoaxer. That made me respect
Todd MORE actually.
I have talked to him at length on the Day watcher theory and I find nothing wrong with it. It makes sense to me
for their very survival

Todd seems sincere in what he says, maybe he saw something out in the woods but unable to get any video he made some hoaxed videos.

I am not sure why believers that willingly accept the PGF do not accept standings footage?

Its like they want the PGF to remain the gold standard "goto" film.

At least standing put some more effort into his costumes.

I think he is worse than a hoaxer.. I think he is a con-artist. You had to pay to see his videos and when some of them were actually put on youtube ie;"eye-movement" these were obvious puppets. They did not even resemble one another.

If you were so worried about protecting this species, why on earth would you try to sell your vids? wouldn't you send them to whatever agency ran your wildlife department?

Now, say those were not puppets in the vids. This guy is sitting on a gold-mine of genetic evidence. Fresh evidence! Why didn't he send in samples to whoever to help his cause?

I am not a fan of Matt Moneymaker, but I will take a know-it-all idiot over a crook anyday.

I wanna come out to Northern Ca next summer and do some searching. What spots are good? Is where the 2 Bigfoots were shot good?

Trinity and Humbolt counties are the best. They are in far Northern California near the coast.

Youse ever go there and if so, any activity you caught?

Seriously if Standing was a CON artist and a HOAXER, WHY on EARTH would Les Stroud who has basically GIVEN his
life for the study of survival, risk the mountain of work he has compiled and throw it away on Standing? That makes
NO sense to me. If you read Les Strouds material each time he has gone out to film his shows, has consumed some of
his life. Its THAT tough. Thats why he quit doing the show, he was so exhausted after doing a show he was not recovering
properly. Why would a man of such stature go out and destroy all that credibility by associating with Todd the CON ARTIST?
I just dont get that at all.

Why not, it would be better than watching the four musketeers wander around the woods and find nothing. Maybe Les will find something.

Danny Squatchanini wrote:Youse ever go there and if so, any activity you caught?

I have property in southern trinity county. No activity near my place that I know of, but try near Hyampom, or up near Willow Creek. Lots of sightings there.

GT3Paul wrote:Seriously if Standing was a CON artist and a HOAXER, WHY on EARTH would Les Stroud who has basically GIVEN his
life for the study of survival, risk the mountain of work he has compiled and throw it away on Standing? That makes
NO sense to me. If you read Les Strouds material each time he has gone out to film his shows, has consumed some of
his life. Its THAT tough. Thats why he quit doing the show, he was so exhausted after doing a show he was not recovering
properly. Why would a man of such stature go out and destroy all that credibility by associating with Todd the CON ARTIST?
I just dont get that at all.

Because it is like what Green said. It would still be better than (not) "Finding Bigfoot", and Stroud has nothing to lose. Best case scenario, he actually finds something which would credit Standing. (In Standings case, I think he may have actually had real experiences in the past, but fabricated his own evidence). Worst case scenario, Les exposes a Con-Artists... It's a win/win situation for him.

But seriously.. Look at what Standing was trying to sell



Now Take note of the Stills, especially the Black one. It looks noting like the blonde moving one

Question:

So its been kinda Leaked that BOBO has said that people have 2 Bodies of Sasquatches.
With the DNA results coming out the fact that Finding Bigfoot is filmed a year in advance.
What if everything comes out. Where does this leave Finding Bigfoot as a TV show?

I would rather see them do a Quick Special to talk about the DNA discovery at present.

Its filmed at most 6 months earlier. I can tell by BoBo's tooth from Joe Rogan's podcast from July 17th. He just lost his tooth days earlier.