A Supposed Photo from Todd and supposed Police artist drawing from Justin's description

And the various looks!!

I'm sure someone has already pointed this out before, but whenever see I Standing's full-face images I can't help but see strong similarities to the work of Arturo Balseiro:

http://www.thehma.net/hma/showthread.php/35867-Arturo-Balseiro-yeti-comes-home-to-roost

https://youtu.be/rdlutBYve0M

Yes an amazing make-up/SFX artist.

So if Bigfoot is from the Hominids family tree where would one place them based off the above 2 Images the photo and the drawing

Here is some comparisons on what different hominids looked like

And as you can see from the link I posted Balseiro will sell his work to collectors............like Standing?

So then Justin Shot and Killed 2 People wearing the same costume and mask as Todd?
So he would be charged for Murder by now wouldn't you think?

http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/artists/paul_mi_redsquatch.jpg
neither of the ones pictured really look like it. however, I so see a lot of descriptions that appear to look like the drawing so only thing I can figure is they don't all look the same. The eyes and nose are what creep me out about the one I linked to. I literally makes me get shivers up my spine even though it was years ago that I saw it.

CMcMillan wrote:So then Justin Shot and Killed 2 People wearing the same costume and mask as Todd?
So he would be charged for Murder by now wouldn't you think?

I don't follow your logic

If Standing is using a mask/s based on anecdotal descriptions, then it should come as no surprise that the supposedly real thing would look very similar to the mask.

The fact that Standing is more than likely using masks in no way undermines Smeja's story or the drawing of what he allegedly saw. It simply doesn't follow that if Standing is a hoaxer, Smeja must be also be one.

Sorry Wood I should have put a smarty face on..
I was being sarcastic.

I just think its neat that the picture drawn by a police drawing expert and the photo are so close in look.
So yes it can be a mask in the photo or i can be a real one.
Standing I find to cries wolf (Bigfoot) alot. But I guess just like the fable when he actually gets a good image who will believe him?

I also have noticed their is a wide range of looks for the Bigfoot creature which is ok I can accept they all may have different looks from young/Old , Female/male and area to area.
the one in the drawing to me looks peaceful if you know what I mean.

I suspect it's more likely to be the other way around - where Standing may have had authentic sightings, but resorted to hoaxing when he couldn't get the footage he wanted to back up his experiences.

As for Elizabeth Daynès reconstructions, I don't think any of them have much resemblance to Smeja's drawing. Also the featured species only represent a small selection of those that might be candidates for a bigfoot ancestor.

As impressive as the reconstructions are it is also worth remembering that a lot of subjective interpretation goes into the modelling and that some of the anthropometry it's based on is decidedly dodgy. In human reconstructions racial interpretation can notoriously be way off.

Having said that I doubt that the hominid reconstructions are massively incorrect and they are probably reasonably good interpretations of what each species may have looked like in general. There's still a lot of guesswork when it comes to muscle, fat and fur/hair density.

The guy in the back far right looked like a california surfer stroking a pose (till i noticed the knife) lol!

If I had to pick one it would be the exhibitionist up front on the far right. I wish I still had the key to the image, so I knew which species was which.

https://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/clarenceclutterbuck/hominids-1.jpg

Not the same collection of Hominids but the best i could find with names on it.

Cool rendering and Bigfoot Police Line-up, CMc! Thanks!

I've always thought Homo Hablis most resembles witness descriptions, though he looks impossibly fat in the line up.

None of the renderings I've noticed have a coned head shape, as is often described.

NobleSavage wrote:None of the renderings I've noticed have a coned head shape, as is often described.

I noticed that also.

Some of the depicted species do have a sagital crest, but that just goes to show how deceptive appearances can be.........although the lack of emphasis of that feature could be down to anthropomorphism influencing the reconstructions.

Todd's photos have always looked rigid and lifeless to me. His photo of the Auburn one with the crazy hair looks even worse.
In one video clip I can see it gently sway side to side as if it's perched on a pole.
Todd releases very limited information and he is evasive on tough questions. He might be a nice guy, but I can't look at his photos without my BS meter going off.

Another thing to onsider is that Orangs have sagital crests, but lack the cone-head associated with BF.