Bigfoot In the NEWS

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/8522059/bigfoot-encounter-in-ohio-goes-viral

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/08/bigfoot-sighting-or-big-joke-you-decide/

http://www.examiner.com/article/bigfoot-video-goes-viral-but-it-s-old-news-and-questionable

So what do you all think about this OLD Video in the news now?

Oh and this clip of a different sighting.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/05/bigfoot-spotted-in-idaho/

The footprint in the snow looks stamped out to me, is that an actual photo from the site of the filming? Or some prop used by the local media..?

I agree with Savage, the toes are straight across and the little dip on the side seems to be in the wrong place. it looks like a fake to me.

The footage is very impressive to me on the surface level. The subject's movements are natural, and he/she covers ground easily. The footprint is highly suspect to me. I wish we could find out if that's an actual print found near the filming area.

The Bigfoot in the qaud footage has no traits of a bigfoot and all the traits of a human. Short arms, short in height, short legs and short stride.
All the markings of a made up video.

The Pocatello footage looks to me to be EXACTLY a copy of footage I saw of a BF in the trees around a ridge in North Carolina. Some folks
were having chestnuts roasting by an open fire and walking in the snow, and taped the creature up on that ridge
Pocatello is in south eastern Idaho and is home to Dr Meldrum and Idaho State University. Not much on reporting.
Probably got the reporter from a Maverick Gas Station.
I am afraid that one is not believable.

IT IS POSSIBLE BF is in South eastern Idaho. I just dont think that one is it

I am baffled on the print. It does have the characteristics of a real print in that it seems to gradually sink in, as opposed to a prosthetic foot which would basically leave a foot-shaped crater. But this is snow, not dirt and snow behaves differently so I don't know.

As to the dimensions of the creature it's self, you do not see enough of it to determine any of it's proportions. But we have "Marked Hominid"(Possible Neanderthal) reports here in the Pacific Northwest as well as your classic Sasquatch. Those are said to look more human in size and body proportions.

If we judge everything off of "Patty" we may overlook evidence that there could be more than one hairy man-thing out there. As it is now,those in the Ape-camp are ONLY looking for an ape and using methods to attract apes (such as gorilla pheromones). The Human-Hominid camp is basing everything off of clips of Patty when for all we know there could be four or five types of hominids and a few apes that are all categorized as "Bigfoot".

I agree that print just doesn't look right for a reason that's tough to pin down. For one, it doesn't seem to reflect any of the kinetic qualities squatch prints often display. There is no splay, and it looks 'stamped' for lack of a better term. Who knows though, certainly not I, if the maker simply stamped it's foot down in that fashion while moving. The behavior of the subject is what is impressive to me. It's behavior fits the classic retreat and cover that witnesses very often describe. It moves well, in the deep snow, and looks natural in the environment, and unencumbered by some bulky suit.

Good observations Tzeith.