When looking at any Bigfoot Story/Topic/Evidence...

Hopefully the moderators will keep this topic I think this can be a serious discussion that can maybe even make the most hardened proponants take a step back and think about things....

When looking at any Bigfoot Story/Topic/Evidence...if you think, could this be explained by Bigfoot not existing?.... the answer more often than not seems to be a resounding yes!

Lets take a few examples:

Could the fact that we have no trail camera photos be explained by Bigfoot not existing... yep.

Could the fact that there is no sign of this DNA study ever coming out be explained by Bigfoot not existing... yep.

Could the fact that there is only 1 video of a bigfoot and that was done by a known conman be explained by Bigfoot not existing.. yep.

It goes on and on.

I am not saying bigfoots do or do not exist, I am just saying a lot of things are explained if they didnt exist.

I understand your point but the flip side of the coin is just as valid...

Could ancient Native American stories be explained by Bigfoot existing? Yep.

Could the overwhelming number of possible sightings be explained by Bigfoot existing? Yep.

Could the fact there is sign of the University DNA study being released be explained by Bigfoot existing? Yep.

Could the recorded woodland sounds that are unidentified be explained by Bigfoot existing? Yep.

It could go on and on as well.

Hopefully the moderators will keep this topic I think this can be a serious discussion that can maybe even make the most hardened proponants take a step back and think about things....

When looking at any Bigfoot Story/Topic/Evidence...if you think, could this be explained by Bigfoot not existing?.... the answer more often than not seems to be a resounding yes!

Lets take a few examples:

Could the fact that we have no trail camera photos be explained by Bigfoot not existing... yep.

Their are Trail Camera Photos of Unidentified Animal. So saying we have no Camera Evidence is false.

Could the fact that there is no sign of this DNA study ever coming out be explained by Bigfoot not existing... yep.

The Oxford University DNA Study is still on track for Novemberish. So your Information is false

Could the fact that there is only 1 video of a bigfoot and that was done by a known conman be explained by Bigfoot not existing.. yep.

Which Video do you speak of? PGF or the most recent. You are also not taking in acount any of the other Images and Video's that are not done by supposed Con-men. So again your conclusion is false.

It goes on and on.

I am not saying bigfoots do or do not exist, I am just saying a lot of things are explained if they didnt exist.

As DPinkerton has said in the past, The fact we can replicate a tornado we can make one man made doesn't mean people are running around making tornado's to destroy things.

Not really sure what you are wanting from this topic. You are taking single evidence and coming to the conclusion while most of us take the collection of evidence and come to the other conclusion

Lots of new species are discovered every year. In fact a new primate was just discovered in Africa this year. Just because we don't see it on a regular basis say like a deer or bear, does not mean it doesn't exist.

Gorillas were a myth/legend/ tall tale until early in the 20th century.

I could sit and prove/disprove anything all day long with statistics, photos, tracks, vocal recordings,etc... But I choose not to. I for one would like to take all this evidence and analyze it, give you my findings and let you make your own decision.

Why do people decide what they believe, and then look for evidence to back their belief? People should look at all the evidence and then decide what they believe. 5 years ago when I first started researching bigfoot if someone pressed me for an answer I would have said I did'nt believe. Now after 5 years of research I have no doubt that they are real. Let the evidence decide what you believe.