13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
Well I am just catching up with todays events and wow, not even I could have predicted this circus show.
Wow.
This is the beginning of the end of bigfooting. Still no evidence and no evidence in sight.
Rick Dyer its all on you now buddy
Wow.
This is the beginning of the end of bigfooting. Still no evidence and no evidence in sight.
Rick Dyer its all on you now buddy
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
BurdenOfProof wrote:Well I am just catching up with todays events and wow, not even I could have predicted this circus show.
Wow.
This is the beginning of the end of bigfooting. Still no evidence and no evidence in sight.
Rick Dyer its all on you now buddy
OH look the typical TROLL work from Burden
Evidence is there. Just because you don't accept it doesn't make it not Evidence.
Grow up
CMcMillan- Posts : 1097
Join date : 2012-08-05
Location : USA CT
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
CMC PLEASE tell me you arent buying into ketchums claims? PLEASE at least say that.
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
CMcMillan wrote:Evidence is there. Just because you don't accept it doesn't make it not Evidence.
You do realised that there's a sliding scale for the quality of evidence, right? That there's good evidence and bad evidence? Just because there's evidence of some sort doesn't mean that the case is closed, or even that there's a good case to be made.
All evidence needs to be evaluated and studied.
Squatchmaster G- Posts : 202
Join date : 2013-01-26
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
lets not forget lionel hutz here "We've plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence. "
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
I really really really want to read Ketchum's paper so I can make my own mind up about what it contains but there's no way I'm giving her $30. ARGH
Squatchmaster G- Posts : 202
Join date : 2013-01-26
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
Squatchmaster G wrote:I really really really want to read Ketchum's paper so I can make my own mind up about what it contains but there's no way I'm giving her $30. ARGH
Theres was a post on the blog from someone who read saying it wasnt very good science. Someone at jref said it was "really, really funny".
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
Nothing quite like creating topics with incendiary titles, eh Burden of proof? End of bigfooting. LOL. You really are too much sometimes.
paul830- Posts : 97
Join date : 2013-01-16
Age : 50
Location : Toronto Canada
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
BurdenOfProof wrote:CMC PLEASE tell me you arent buying into ketchums claims? PLEASE at least say that.
Did you read the Paper?
If you haven't then I suggest you do for yourself instead of waiting for people to review it.
Oh wait because you all don't want to Spend Money to read it.
Then I suggest you shut-up about it.
Its a Paper it is intresting to read.
Doesn't matter if I believe it or not. It is out for everyone to read it and make their own minds up.
So what have you done in the Big Foot world? At least she is putting her money where her mouth is unlike you.
CMcMillan- Posts : 1097
Join date : 2012-08-05
Location : USA CT
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
paul830 wrote:Nothing quite like creating topics with incendiary titles, eh Burden of proof? End of bigfooting. LOL. You really are too much sometimes.
Ok so where is the acceptance? Where are the mass news articles that the believers claimed would occur when this "groundbreaking" paper???
You can believe in bigfoot if you want thats fine, but its shameless to try to defend this paper.
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
Why is it shamless to defend.
from one of your own places you quoted.
That man appears to be the only real scientist. He in the end says He would need to view more information
“As a scientist I would consider anything.The currency of scientific advance is keeping your skepticism at bay. You have to approach these things incredibly agnostically. As I read the paper I asked, is the evidence here compelling? I don’t know. Is there clear evidence of fraud? That’s not apparent. It’s an intriguing hypothesis. One would need to view more sequencing information before supporting the conclusions.”
from one of your own places you quoted.
That man appears to be the only real scientist. He in the end says He would need to view more information
CMcMillan- Posts : 1097
Join date : 2012-08-05
Location : USA CT
Re: 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
CMcMillan wrote:Why is it shamless to defend.“As a scientist I would consider anything.The currency of scientific advance is keeping your skepticism at bay. You have to approach these things incredibly agnostically. As I read the paper I asked, is the evidence here compelling? I don’t know. Is there clear evidence of fraud? That’s not apparent. It’s an intriguing hypothesis. One would need to view more sequencing information before supporting the conclusions.”
from one of your own places you quoted.
That man appears to be the only real scientist. He in the end says He would need to view more information
So essentially hes saying she has proved NOTHING because she has not shared her data. Poor poor science.
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Similar topics
» Cabin in the woods
» Argosy Magazine February 1968
» Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
» Going BigFooting/Dogman Adventure
» Ghost Hunters on SyFy
» Argosy Magazine February 1968
» Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
» Going BigFooting/Dogman Adventure
» Ghost Hunters on SyFy
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|