Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
+8
MT Stickbow
sasdave
Tzieth
Ravinoff
BurdenOfProof
dmaker
Green911
Got Yeti Yet?
12 posters
Page 1 of 1
Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
Which name is, to you, the most reliable goto in Bigfootery? The name you'd hang your hat on if you had a hat, and a horse in the race?
a) Melba Ketchum
b) Don Jeffrey Meldrum
c) Todd Standing
d) Adrian Sykes
e) Justin Smeja
f) Rick Dyer
g) Bob Gimlin
h) Al DeAtley
i) Patricia Patterson
j) Bob Heironimous
k) Steven Streufert
l) MK Davis
m) Bill Munns
n) Ro Sahebi
o) Phil Poeling
p) John Bindernagel
q) Stacey Brown
r) John Greene
s) Eric Dahinden
t) Bobo
u) Les Stroud
v) Cliff Barrackman
w) Renae Holland
x) James Fay
y) Matthew Moneymaker
z) SHAWN
a) Melba Ketchum
b) Don Jeffrey Meldrum
c) Todd Standing
d) Adrian Sykes
e) Justin Smeja
f) Rick Dyer
g) Bob Gimlin
h) Al DeAtley
i) Patricia Patterson
j) Bob Heironimous
k) Steven Streufert
l) MK Davis
m) Bill Munns
n) Ro Sahebi
o) Phil Poeling
p) John Bindernagel
q) Stacey Brown
r) John Greene
s) Eric Dahinden
t) Bobo
u) Les Stroud
v) Cliff Barrackman
w) Renae Holland
x) James Fay
y) Matthew Moneymaker
z) SHAWN
Got Yeti Yet?- Posts : 37
Join date : 2012-08-14
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
I left my heart and hat somewhere in Baltimore. I'm leaning heavily toward Streufert, Renae and Munns. Quite an interesting fucking combination, wouldn't you say?
Got Yeti Yet?- Posts : 37
Join date : 2012-08-14
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
That's the $10,000 question. Personally I will wait till someone has something interesting to give before I start investigating what they are saying. So far no one on the list.
Green911- Posts : 140
Join date : 2012-08-17
Age : 56
Location : Sacramento, CA
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
t) Bobo
He can be relied upon to say something idiotic every time he opens his mouth.
He can be relied upon to say something idiotic every time he opens his mouth.
dmaker- Posts : 8
Join date : 2013-04-09
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
j) Bob Heironimous
If the footers would just listen to him, he solved this bigfoot craze many years ago.
There is no evidence of a bigfoot in bluff creek any time before or after the film.
If the footers would just listen to him, he solved this bigfoot craze many years ago.
There is no evidence of a bigfoot in bluff creek any time before or after the film.
BurdenOfProof- Posts : 263
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
BurdenOfProof wrote:j) Bob Heironimous
If the footers would just listen to him, he solved this bigfoot craze many years ago.
There is no evidence of a bigfoot in bluff creek any time before or after the film.
Ehh, I think the Patterson film is probably the most authentic-looking Bigfoot film. Whether it's real or not, I don't know, but the "Patty" suit looks a whole lot better than the ape outfits in Beneath The Planet Of The Apes, which came out at the same time.
Edit to add: there's just as much evidence for Patty being real as there is for Bob Heironimous helping Patterson and Gimlin hoax it, ie. none.
Ravinoff- Posts : 63
Join date : 2012-11-13
Age : 29
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
BurdenOfProof wrote:j) Bob Heironimous
If the footers would just listen to him, he solved this bigfoot craze many years ago.
There is no evidence of a bigfoot in bluff creek any time before or after the film.
Huh??? Sorry i know this is old, but still.. The reason Patterson was in Bluff Creek to begin with is because there was evidence lol. That is where the word "Bigfoot" was born.
Heironimous couldn't even tell anyone where Bluff Creek was before he took the dirt-nap, yet Gimlin seemed to have no problem remembering. Then there is the double Negative. Heironomous said that they were ALL Con-Artists (Himself included) as he said Patterson did this and Patterson did that and was arrested for this or that... Yet the Police Reports say otherwise. So isn't it sort of hypocritical that Skeptic's and Nay-Sayers whole-heartedly believe Bob H about how Patterson was a hoaxer and always in trouble with the law, when official documentation says otherwise?
Tzieth- Posts : 478
Join date : 2012-08-27
Age : 50
Location : Vancouver, Washington
Who's the guru on sasquatch.
Personally I haven't heard of a lot on the list. Patterson was the one to bring me out of the woods on this subject. When I seen his footage I at least had a clearer idea of what I seen. Even with the years of nonbelievers scoffing his footage. Melba is now on my list, as at least she is trying to get scientific proof.
sasdave- Posts : 80
Join date : 2013-03-24
Location : vancouver island canada
Who's the guru on Sasquatch
MT Stickbow wrote:What about Robert Morgan
Hi MT; Who is Robert Morgan? I dhecked on google it appears he is a poet and or a film maker. There was a fella years ago who was on his way to a symposium with evidance and he was going to prove the reality of the sasquatch; yet, the plane crashed. John Magor was also ahead of his time on this subject and also regarding UFO's; he wrote 3 books and had a magazine out (Canadian UFO report) for many years. In one of his books he had a picture of bigfoot on the Duncan river, won't give details or the trolls will be jumping.
sasdave- Posts : 80
Join date : 2013-03-24
Location : vancouver island canada
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
I like the wave Barrackman is riding. He seems credible to me. Hope he keeps that style.
Last edited by Sissy sass n scratch on Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:54 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : Spelling)
Sissy sass n scratch- Posts : 3
Join date : 2013-08-08
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
I find Will Jevning's research interesting.
SASTEX- Posts : 2
Join date : 2014-05-14
Age : 65
Location : NE Texas
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
Hmm I never did answer that question did I?... Non of the above. Though some make sense and some seem way off in left field, they are all using speculation.
The person who can prove their theory by actually documenting a sasquatch in it's natural habitat (and I mean like Jane Goodall, not Todd Standing!) Becomes the most credible.
Yes I know video alone will not be proof. However if you are able to do this, then you also have the ability to get the proof. You are not just collecting stool or hair samples, you are filming the stool coming from the source and filming yourself collecting it and sealing it. Or you see a sasquatch scratching it's back on a tree, you film it and film collecting the hair sample.
If all of their theories were so solid, then they would have done this long ago.
You will never prove sasquatch exists otherwise... Even with a body if Sasquatch are in our g
genus (human). A body will be chalked up as a deformed homosapien. Remember Bigfoot Bounty?... Many of those samples came back as human. IF Sasquatch are human (as the morphology. Of their footprints suggest, and are not sequenced, then the machine will catalong the samples with the closest match... homosapien-sapiens. No one is going to attempt to sequence Dna that they think is already sequenced. But film an entire population of them for weeks and film yourself collecting fresh samples and the game changes a little.
The person who can prove their theory by actually documenting a sasquatch in it's natural habitat (and I mean like Jane Goodall, not Todd Standing!) Becomes the most credible.
Yes I know video alone will not be proof. However if you are able to do this, then you also have the ability to get the proof. You are not just collecting stool or hair samples, you are filming the stool coming from the source and filming yourself collecting it and sealing it. Or you see a sasquatch scratching it's back on a tree, you film it and film collecting the hair sample.
If all of their theories were so solid, then they would have done this long ago.
You will never prove sasquatch exists otherwise... Even with a body if Sasquatch are in our g
genus (human). A body will be chalked up as a deformed homosapien. Remember Bigfoot Bounty?... Many of those samples came back as human. IF Sasquatch are human (as the morphology. Of their footprints suggest, and are not sequenced, then the machine will catalong the samples with the closest match... homosapien-sapiens. No one is going to attempt to sequence Dna that they think is already sequenced. But film an entire population of them for weeks and film yourself collecting fresh samples and the game changes a little.
Tzieth- Posts : 478
Join date : 2012-08-27
Age : 50
Location : Vancouver, Washington
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
I agree with Sastex. Will Jevning is the best. The only problem with Will is he is easy to ridicule
some of the farther out there witnesses other than that he is probably the best.
some of the farther out there witnesses other than that he is probably the best.
GT3Paul- Admin
- Posts : 315
Join date : 2012-08-01
Re: Who Is The Most Reliable Name In Bigfooting Today???
Wes Germer lol only joking he has to be the worse ever what a clown!
Brooksey501- Posts : 7
Join date : 2015-03-28
Similar topics
» Going BigFooting/Dogman Adventure
» 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
» Have you laughed today?
» Have you laughed today?
» Sasquatch: What are they saying?
» 13th February 2013 - The Day Bigfooting Died.
» Have you laughed today?
» Have you laughed today?
» Sasquatch: What are they saying?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|